ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Sustain. Food Syst.

Sec. Agricultural and Food Economics

Fiscal and Tax Policy Incentives for Agricultural Green Development in Chongqing: A Dynamic CGE Simulation

  • 1. College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

  • 2. Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Agricultural green development has become a critical policy objective for reconciling agricultural productivity with ecological sustainability, especially in environmentally fragile and topographically constrained regions. However, existing studies have mainly focused on micro-level behavior or single-policy evaluations and have paid insufficient attention to how fiscal and tax incentives affect agricultural green development through intersectoral linkages, price transmission, and fiscal constraints at the macro level. This study develops a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to examine how fiscal and tax policy incentives affect agricultural green development across three dimensions: green production, green consumption, and green innovation. By simulating production subsidies, production tax incentives, and their combinations, the analysis evaluates their effects on input use, carbon emissions, technological innovation, and macroeconomic performance. The simulation results show that moderate subsidies help reduce chemical fertilizer and pesticide use, whereas production tax incentives and high-intensity policy packages tend to generate rebound effects through scale expansion. Similar patterns are observed for carbon emissions, with reductions occurring only when efficiency gains outweigh expansion effects. An increase in demand for innovation services does not necessarily improve environmental outcomes unless it leads to efficiency gains and technological substitution. At the macro level, most scenarios generate contractionary effects because of fiscal constraints. Overall, policy effectiveness depends not simply on policy intensity, but on how well environmental objectives, agricultural performance, and fiscal sustainability are aligned.

Summary

Keywords

Agricultural green development, CGE model, Production subsidies, Scale effect, Substitution effect, tax incentives

Received

10 April 2026

Accepted

22 May 2026

Copyright

© 2026 蕾, Wang and Ye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Junfang Ye

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics