SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders
Cognitive Correlates of Decision-Making in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review
- JB
Johanna Buechel 1,2
- MM
Marc Montgomery Laesser 2
- NP
Noelia Peña Arauzo 3
- KT
Katharina Thaler 3
- JC
Jens Carsten Moeller 4
- AF
Alessandra Fanciulli 3
- PM
Philipp Mahlknecht 3
- LZ
Laura Zamarian 3
1. Private Universitat im Furstentum Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
2. Klinikgruppe Valens, Rehaklinik Walzenhausen, Walzenhausen, Switzerland
3. Medizinische Universitat Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
4. Division of Neurorehabilitation, Fribourg Hospital, Meyriez-Murten, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Changes in decision-making (DM) are frequently observed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite extensive research, the relationships between DM and various cognitive functions remain incompletely understood. This systematic review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the link between DM and cognition in PD, emphasizing a comprehensive perspective that considers multiple cognitive domains and various DM tasks. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, PubPsych, and LIVIVO databases. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that examined the relationship between DM performance and cognitive functions in individuals with PD. Data extraction focused on sample characteristics, types of DM tasks employed, cognitive domains assessed, and key findings on their association. Results: A total of 38 studies, published between 2001 and 2025, involving 1,313 individuals with PD, were identified. Most of these studies used laboratory-based DM tasks – with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) as the most frequently used DM paradigm, followed by the Game of Dice Task (GDT) – whereas only few studies employed ecologically valid DM tasks that simulate real-life DM contexts. A substantial number of studies investigated the association of DM performance with global cognitive status, executive functions, and memory. Fewer studies explored social cognition, psychomotor speed and attention, visuo-construction and visuo-spatial skills, language, and numerical abilities. Most analyses on the association between DM and cognition in PD revealed non-significant findings. Among the studies reporting significant associations, findings did not consistently cluster around specific cognitive domains or DM tasks, indicating heterogeneity in results. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the complex and often inconsistent relationship between cognitive functions and DM in individuals with PD. Despite some evidence of significant associations, most findings are non-significant, scattered, and influenced by methodological variability across studies. Future research should aim for standardized, ecologically valid assessments and consider the multifaceted nature of cognition and DM to better elucidate these relationships in PD.
Summary
Keywords
associations, Gambling, Methodological variability, neuropsychological testing, real-life decision-making
Received
26 March 2026
Accepted
22 May 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Buechel, Laesser, Peña Arauzo, Thaler, Moeller, Fanciulli, Mahlknecht and Zamarian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Laura Zamarian
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.