Abstract
In light of the evolving dimensions of the right to education, this opinion piece shows how UN human rights treaties play a key role in monitoring and interpreting the right to education, which contributes to advance its implementation and evolution. It highlights how civil society organizations, when engaging with them, particularly through reporting mechanisms, influence their work and therefore also contribute to advance the realization of the right to education both at international and national levels. This opinion piece argues that the growing concerns and challenges in the functioning of these mechanisms, and more broadly in monitoring and reporting on the right to education, put under threat their useful contribution at a pivotal time for the right to education. It calls for the protection and strengthening of their work, essentially through adequate financing.
1 Introduction
The right to education is enshrined in human rights treaties adopted in the second half of the twentieth century [, chapter 2]. The UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education was adopted in 1960, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in 19661 and the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989.2 Since then, the world has evolved, as well as education. As an illustration, the growing use of technology in education in today's world opens a new dimension of education which did not exist when these treaties were adopted (Swiss Commission for UNESCO, 2024). Also, the current recognition of the fundamental importance of early childhood care and education (UNESCO and UNICEF, 2024), which calls for strengthening the existing international legal framework (Tashkent Declaration, 2022, para. 2.v; , paras. 106, 107; UN Human Rights Council, 2024), shows that this dimension was not reflected as a priority in the treaties adopted at this time. Other new dimensions such as the nexus between climate change and education or the emerging concept of lifelong learning are also absent from these treaties. Taking into account these changes, UNESCO launched, in 2021, an initiative on the evolving right to education, which explores “how international human rights instruments can be reinforced and further developed to address today's needs and challenges” (UNESCO, 2023).
In this context, the work of UN human rights treaty bodies3 can be helpful. As part of the international human rights architecture, one of their roles is to monitor the implementation of UN human rights treaties. Made up of independent experts, they provide observations and recommendations, which serve to inform political and legal action to improve human rights protection and implementation, including the right to education. Among them, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) monitors the implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC), the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. This opinion piece focuses on these two,4 which play a key role in monitoring and interpreting the implementation of the right to education (1). When civil society organizations (CSOs) engage with these Committees through different mechanisms, they influence their work and contribute to advance the realization of the right to education both at international and national levels (2). There are growing concerns and challenges in the functioning of these mechanisms, and more broadly in monitoring and reporting on the right to education, and it is timely and essential to address them (3).
2 The monitoring and interpretation of the implementation of the right to education by UN Human rights treaty bodies
Human rights treaties are “living instruments” (). The interpretation and application of the human rights they guarantee evolve to reflect the realities of societies in continual transformation. Moeckli and White note that “social change triggers change in the treaty through the medium of interpretative agents,” such as “the organs created by the treaty.” The CRC affirms that “the Convention, like all human rights instruments, must be regarded as a living instrument, whose interpretation develops over time” (, para. 20), which “is crucial to ensuring its relevance and utility to child right-holders” (). Each treaty body, including the CRC and the CESCR, publishes its interpretation of the provisions of its respective human rights treaty in the form of “general comments.”5 The “concluding observations,” they issue for each State when monitoring periodically their implementation of a respective treaty, can also be a source of interpretation (; ; ). Regarding the right to education, the CESCR published two General Comments in 1999: General Comment No. 11: Plans of Action for Primary Education (Article 14) and General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (Article 13). In 2001, the CRC published General Comment No. 1: The aims of education (Article 29.1). As these general comments were adopted a quarter of a century ago, it is worth looking at more recent ones, which include references to the right to education, for more recent interpretation. For instance, the General Comment No. 7 of the CRC on “Implementing child rights in early childhood,” adopted in 2005, for a specific interpretation of the right to early childhood care and education or its General Comment No. 26 on children's rights and the environment, with a special focus on climate change, adopted in 2023 (). In the latter, the Committee notes that “since the adoption of the Convention, growing acceptance has emerged of the wide-ranging interconnections between children's rights and environmental protection,” stressing that “unprecedented environmental crises and the resulting challenges for the realization of children's rights require a dynamic interpretation of the Convention” (, para. 9).
In addition, through their concluding observations, both the CRC and the CESCR have provided interpretations regarding the application of specific dimensions of the right to education. For instance, in the context of the growing privatization of education, Jacqueline Mowbray argues that international human rights law contains a right to public education () on the basis, inter alia, of the interpretation of the UN treaties bodies. She refers to “the concluding observations of the treaty bodies (…),” which require states to “prioritize the provision of quality, free primary education at public schools over the provision of education at private schools” (, para. 58.b) and, in particular, to prioritize the allocation of resources to public schools (, para. 74.c; , para. 68.b; , para. 18). She also notes that the “interpretation of the relevant legal provisions (that they require states to develop and maintain a public education system) is supported by recent treaty body practice (…).” So, for example, the CESCR noted in its concluding observations in relation to Kenya that it was “concerned that inadequacies in the public schooling system have led to the proliferation of so-called ‘low-cost private schools”' (, para. 57) and recommended “that the State party take all the measures necessary to strengthen its public education sector” (, para. 58). Similarly, the Committee on the Rights of the Child has required states to “prioritize the provision of quality, free primary education at public schools over the provision of education at private schools” ( para. 58.b).
The interpretations of the right to education made by UN human rights treaty bodies, particularly by the CRC and CESCR contribute to its evolution across the years, addressing new dimensions and challenges ().
3 The contribution of civil society organizations to the work of UN human rights treaty bodies
Civil society organizations play an important role in monitoring and reporting on the enjoyment and implementation of the right to education, including to UN human rights treaty bodies. Having specific expertise and working on the ground close to rights holders, they can provide alternative views and insights into education issues that States may not be aware of, or bring additional information. Their important work can provide useful inputs in the development of laws and policies. Civil society can also contribute to holding States accountable for implementation gaps and/or violations of the right to education. When reporting or litigating, they can also contribute to the development of a jurisprudence and therefore to widening the interpretation of the provisions related to the right to education. In this regard, their participation in the reporting process of the UN human rights treaty bodies, through the submission of alternative reports and the conversations with the UN experts can contribute to advance the realization and development of the right to education. The issues raises by CSOs about a particular State are often reflected in the concluding observations adopted by the UN treaty bodies, sometimes taking into account the wording used by the CSOs.
In 2015, a group of CSOs submitted a report to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, about the right to higher education in France, arguing that the structural, territorial, and socio-economic inequalities as well as the higher education financing policy, both hindered equality and non-discrimination in access to higher education (). In its concluding observations about France (, paras. 56, 57), the CESCR dedicated a full section on higher education drawing on the argument made in the CSOs' report. While expressing concerns “about the steady decline in the budget per student allocated by the State,” the committee recommends that France “review the allocation of the higher education budget with a view to the gradual introduction of free higher education.” In their report, the CSOs, referring to articles 13 and 14 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, had recalled that “any ‘deliberately regressive measures' in higher education, such as budget cuts, would require the most careful consideration” “stressing that the State must demonstrate that such regressive measures are fully justified.” In its concluding observations, when expressing concerns about the decline in the budget, the Committee specifies that this “is contrary to the obligation to progressively achieve the full realization of the rights recognized in the present Covenant (arts. 13 and 14).” These conclusions were mentioned in a report prepared by a member of the French Parliament for budgetary opinion on the “Higher Education and Student Life” section of the draft finance bill for 2024 (, p. 55). In 2024, a draft law related to access to higher education introduced free public higher education, following the recommendations made by the Committee (, article 9).
The role of civil society organizations is also particularly relevant in the context of emerging issues, such as the increased privatization and commercialization of education that have transformed education systems in most regions of the world and raised legal questions regarding the application of the right to education in this new context. Indeed, the international treaties adopted in the second half of the 20th century have general provisions that did not cover the application of the right to education in such specific context. From 2015, civil society organizations started monitoring the impacts of this phenomenon on the right to education and reported to UN Treaties bodies [; ; ; ; ], mainly to the CRC and CESCR. They brought this new issue to the attention of the UN experts, who looked into it, questioned States about it and adopted concluding observations on this topic. In a few years, CSOs submitted reports from various countries and regions leading to a development of a jurisprudence on this issue (), useful to guide the interpretation of the right to education in such a particular context. Their concluding observations were notably used for the development of the Abidjan Principles on the human rights obligations of States to provide public education and to regulate private involvement in education.6
4 The essential work of UN human rights treaty bodies and civil society organization under threat
Despite the importance of monitoring and reporting on the right to education, both to advance the realization of the right to education and contribute to its evolution, as described above, there are particular challenges remain for the monitoring of the right to education within the UN systems and for civil society organizations to collect data and use these mechanisms.
The current financial crisis the UN is facing (UN, 2025) impacts the effective functioning of UN human rights treaty bodies (), with sessions cancelled7 and participation limited to in-person attendance only.8 This limits both the work of the UN Treaty bodies and the engagement of civil society organizations with the UN experts.9 With delays in the States' review process, issues are pending to be examined and the development of the jurisprudence by the UN Committees is slowing down.
At the same time, civil society organizations are facing challenges in monitoring the right to education, including difficulties in accessing data, due to lack of transparency (), administrative requirements, and insecurity issues such as life risk in conflict affected countries [] or threat when working on a sensitive topic (). Cost and lack of expertise to understand how to use human rights law and mechanisms can also limit CSO in monitoring and the right to education.
5 Conclusion
UN treaty bodies, in particular the CRC and CESCR, play an important role in advancing the full realization of the right to education. Their general comments and concluding observations provide guidance to States for the development of law and policies. They are particularly useful to guide the implementation of dimensions of the right to education not explicit in the treaties, such as the right to early childhood care and education or of new dimensions, such as the use of technologies in education. Their interpretations, across time, of the provisions on the right to education contained in human rights treaties, contribute to the evolution of the scope of this right. They should be used as a reference for the development of any new legally binding instrument on the right to education.
When civil society organizations contribute to the work of the UN treaty bodies, they influence the development of their interpretation and so the evolution of the right to education.
At this challenging and pivotal time for both the implementation of the right to education and its evolution, it is essential to protect and strengthen the effective functioning of the UN human rights treaties bodies and to support the work of civil society organizations in monitoring and reporting, notably by provided adequate funding. Such investment is needed for the full realization of the right to education.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
DD: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
1.^The right to education is guaranteed in articles 13 and 14.
2.^The right to education is guaranteed in articles 28 and 29.
3.^Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Human Rights Committee, Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Committee against Torture, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Committee on Migrants Workers, The Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Committee on Enforced Disappearances.
4.^Other treaty-bodies, such as the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women or the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, play a key role in monitoring the right to education of specific groups. The CRC and CESCR monitor the right to education more broadly.
5.^‘General recommendations' for the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.
6.^See https://www.abidjanprinciples.org/
7.^See for instance the cancellation of the 101th pre-session of the Committee on the Right of the Child in May 2025.
8.^See for instance the letter sent by more than 300 civil society organizations in January 2025, urging the UN to ensure defenders can continue to participate online.
9.^See for instance: Child Rights Connect Statement at the opening of the 98th CRC session in January 2025.
References
1
Association of Women Head of Families (AFCF), the Coalition of Mauritanian Education Organizations (COMEDUC) and the Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR). (2018). Alternative Report to the CRC on Privatization and the Sale of Public School Lands in Mauritania. AFCF, COMEDUC, GI-ESCR.
2
Boly BarryK. (2022). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education: Early Childhood Care and Education. UN General Assembly.
3
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2016). Concluding Observations: Kenya, E/C.12/KEN/CO/2-5. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
4
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2023). Concluding Observations: France, E/C.12/FRA/CO/5. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
5
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2007). General Comment No. 8, U.N. Doc. CRC/C/GC/8. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
6
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2015a). Concluding Observations: Brazil, CRC/C/BRA/CO/2-4, para. 74(c). Committee on the Rights of the Child.
7
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2015b). Concluding Observations: Chile, CRC/C/CHL/CO/4-5. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
8
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2016a). Concluding Observations: Kenya, CRC/C/KEN/CO/3-5. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
9
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2016b). Concluding Observations: UK, CRC/C/GBR/CO/5. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
10
Committee on the Rights of the Child (2023). General Comment No. 26 on Children's Rights and the Environment with a Special Focus on Climate Change, U.N. Doc. CRC/C/GC/26. Committee on the Rights of the Child.
11
DaviH. (2023). Avis N° 1781 présenté au nom Commission des affaires culturelles de l'éducation sur le projet de loi de finances pour 2024: recherche et enseignement supérieur, et vie étudiante enseignement supérieur. Assemblée nationale française.
12
DaviH.ArenasR.AutainC.BoulouxM.BourgeauxJ. L.BoyardL. (2024). Proposition de loi n° 2488 relative à l'accès à l'enseignement supérieur. Paris: Assemblée nationale française.
13
FredmanS. (2022). Recognizing early childhood education as a human right in international law. Hum. Rights Law Rev.22:ngac024. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngac024
14
GavrielatosA. (2016). Arrested While Researching: The Case of Curtis Riep and Bridge International. FreshEd.
15
Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2023). Human rights bodies statements on private education September 2014 – October 2023. Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
16
Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR)/Sciences Po Law School Clinic. (2014a). Report to the CESCR on the Consequences of Privatization in Chile.
17
Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (GI-ESCR) and Ghana Education Campaign Coalition. (2014b). Parallel Report to the Committee on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women about Privatization in Education in Ghana.
18
MechlemK. (2009). Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. 42 Vanderbilt J. Transl. Law45, 905–947.
19
MoeckliD.WhiteN. (2016). “Treaties as ‘living instruments',” in Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties 176, eds. KritsiotisD.BowmanM. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 176–171.
20
MowbrayJ. (2021). “Is there a right to public education?,” in Realizing the Abidjan Principles on the Right to Education, eds. AdamsonF.AubryS.de KoningM.DorsiD. (Cheltenham: Elgar and Norrag). doi: 10.4337/9781839106033
21
NolanA. (2022). “Children's Rights,” in International Human Rights Law, 4th Edn., eds. MoeckliD.ShahS.SivakumaranS.HarrisD. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 339–358.
22
NolanA. (2023). General Comment No.26 on Children and the Environment – A Milestone in International Human Rights Law?EJIL: Talk!, Blog of the European Journal of International Law.
23
NyitrayZ. (2024). The Evolving Human Right to Education from the Aspects of Pre-Primary and Secondary Education. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University. doi: 10.15476/ELTE.2024.032
24
Réseau de Recherche Francophone sur la Privatisation de l'Education (2024). International Call: Privatization of Education: Access to Quality Data. Réseau de Recherche Francophone sur la Privatisation de l'Education.
25
Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and others (2015). Alternative Report to the CRC: The UK's Support of the Growth of Private Education Through Its Development Aid: Questioning Its Responsibilities as Regards Its Human Rights Extraterritorial Obligations. Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and others.
26
Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and UNESCO (2019). Right to Education Handbook. Paris; London: Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and UNESCO.
27
Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and others (2020). Alternative Report to the CESCR on the Non-Compliance by France With Its Extra-Territorial Obligations Regarding The Right to Education Through Its Investment in Bridge International Academies. Right to Education Initiative (RTE) and others.
28
Right to Education Initiative (RTE)La FAGE, Global Students Forum. (2023). Submission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - 5th review of France at the 74th Session - The Right to Higher Education in France. Right to Education Initiative (RTE), La FAGE, Global Students Forum.
29
Right to Education Initiative (RTE) (2025). Monitoring the Right to Education in Conflict-Affected Contexts - Key Insights and Strategic Recommendations From a Roundtable Organised by the Right to Education Initiative in July 2025. Right to Education Initiative (RTE).
30
SkeltonA. (2025). Cash strapped! Can the multi-lateral human rights system survive the UN financial crisis?Netherlands Quart. Hum. Rights43, 209–216. doi: 10.1177/09240519251391605
31
SkeltonA.MezmurB. D. (2019). Technology changing @ a dizzying pace: reflections on selected jurisprudence of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and Technology. Peace Hum. Rights Govern.3, 275–305. doi: 10.14658/PUPJ-PHRG-2019-3-1
32
Swiss Commission for UNESCO (2024). Right to Education: Confronting Inequalities by Addressing Privatisation, Digitalisation and Crisis Situations. Bern: UNESCO and Human Rights: Geneva Dialogues for Enhancing Cooperation and Effectiveness, Swiss National Commission for UNESCO, the University of Geneva, UNESCO, OHCHR and the REGARD network.
33
Tashkent Declaration (2022). Tashkent Declaration and Commitments to Action for Transforming Early Childhood Care and Education. Paris: UNESCO.
34
UN (2025). UN Faces Deepening Financial Crisis, Urges Members to Pay Up. UN News.
35
UN Human Rights Council (2024). Resolution on an Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group on an Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Rights to Early Childhood Education, Free Pre-Primary Education and Free Secondary Education. UN Doc. A/HRC/56/L.8/Rev.1. UN Human Rights Council.
36
UNESCO (2023). Initiative on the Evolving Right to Education 2021-2025. Paris: UNESCO.
37
UNESCO and UNICEF (2024). Global Report on Early Childhood Care and Education: The Right to a Strong Foundation.Paris; New York, NY: UNESCO and UNICEF.
Summary
Keywords
civil society, NGOs, evolving right, human rights mechanisms, human rights monitoring, interpretation of human rights treaties, right to education, UN human rights treaty bodies
Citation
Dorsi D (2026) Protecting and strengthening the essential contribution of UN human rights treaty bodies and civil society organizations to the implementation and evolution of the right to education: a necessity at a pivotal time. Front. Educ. 11:1770144. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1770144
Received
17 December 2025
Revised
15 January 2026
Accepted
23 January 2026
Published
19 February 2026
Volume
11 - 2026
Edited by
Peter Larsen, Université de Genève, Switzerland
Reviewed by
Erdem Hareket, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Dorsi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Delphine Dorsi, delphine.dorsi@right-to-education.org
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.